Amateur Art Reviews: Sol LeWitt’s Wall Drawing 273

Viewed at SF Moma, November 26, 2016

garrett kamps
3 min readNov 30, 2016
Sol LeWitt, Wall Drawing 273 (detail), September 1975; graphite and crayon on seven walls, dimensions variable; The Doris and Donald Fisher Collection at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art; © The LeWitt Estate / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York

Sol Lewitt’s Wall Drawing 273 is configurable; it’s never the same piece twice. What the piece consists of is a set of instructions. Paraphrasing: plot seven grids on seven walls; using crayons, draw some combination of Red/Yellow/Blue lines connecting some combination of points on the seven grids. While the color combination and number of lines are specified per wall, the length and vector of the lines is up to the draftsman. The result is seven walls covered in hundreds of straight lines.

The visual itself is oddly impressive work a work considered minimalist: On one wall, there’s a bloom of yellow lines all emanating from the same central point on the grid; on another, dozens of blue and red lines crisscross, creating hundreds of angles. As the piece is currently exhibited at the SF Moma, the walls are placed at non-right angles to one another, and form an enclosed room, with one two-sided wall bisecting the center of the room.

The piece is not what you’d describe as a sumptuous visual experience; there is nothing in particular represented. There are just these grids and these lines and these angles. And yet, the art is evocative — of a children’s coloring book (with the three primary colors), of a sunset (the bloom of yellow lines), of Tron (though it didn’t exist in 1975 when the work was created), of being inside some kind of formal experiment, sort of imprisoned and sort of happily participating, and feeling grateful for the invitation.

Then there is the issue of the instructions, the fact that the artist is at once in complete control of the final presentation and yet has very limited control. The scale of the work isn’t specified, and apparently it has been displayed before in much smaller spaces. The length of the lines, to which points on the grid they’re connected, where they intersect — these are all out of the artist’s hands. I have to imagine this emphasizes a key attribute of the minimalist movement Lewitt was a part of: The artwork is literally just a set of instructions, and only a half-dozen or so at that. The instructions total maybe a hundred words, albeit a hundred words that contain a formula for creating something enormous, something that, once created, likewise suggests a daunting complexity. It’s like a haiku or sonnet, a thing of such seeming simplicity that contains so much potentiality it rattles on the page like a corn kernel waiting to pop. Lewitt’s piece is both the kernel and the pop. You get to experience both at the same time. What’s more, you get to feel the moment that one thing transforms into the other; it’s playing out in real time as you stand there contemplating the artwork. This potentiality is the most powerful aspect of the piece, and it’s invisible; it doesn’t even exist. The only trace it leaves is in your mind.

--

--

garrett kamps

Hello. I write things and publish them here (and elsewhere) from time to time. I’m also a founder of Third Bridge Creative.